patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

The State of Barnegat Bay: Problems And Promises

More attention than ever being paid to waterway, experts agree

 

More attention than ever is being paid to rejuvenating Barnegat Bay, but problems remain, scientists, environmentalists and politicians said Thursday night at a marathon meeting of the Save Barnegat Bay organization.

The group held its annual meeting Thursday night in Lavallette, where experts updated those in attendance on the state of the waterway that spans the length of Ocean County.

"I've been around the bay for a long, long time, and in my life I've never seen so much concern and drive among the politicians to do something," said Rutgers University research professor Mike Kennish, referring to the implementation of Gov. Chris Christie's 10-point plan to save the bay.

The governor, on Jan. 5, signed several bills into law that are aimed at protecting the bay. One of those laws requires the nation's toughest regulation of fertilizer ingredients, specifically nitrogen, which spur the growth of algae and sea lettuce that, in turn, block the growth of native eelgrass beds. Eelgrass beds provide a nesting place for the larvae of finfish and shellfish.

But while most agreed that the package of laws, which also includes regulations on soil compaction and stormwater basin cleanup, are a step in the right direction, problems remain.

War on Sea Nettles

The stinging sea nettle, a small jellyfish that can pack a mean sting, has invaded the northern portion of the bay this season worse than ever before, said Dr. Paul Bologna, a researcher at Montclair State University who studies the bay.

He said rising sea temperatures, lower oxygen concentrations, changes in food webs (species that used to eat the jellyfish are no longer in abundance due to overfishing and other factors) and even genetic adaptations are causing the sea nettles to multiply in big numbers.

Bologna said sea nettles have actually been in the bay dating back prior to the year 1900, but they only began to multiply rapidly in the past decade or so. They are especially adaptable to the northern bay's lack of oxygen and lower levels of salinity due to the influx of fresh water from the Toms and Metedeconk rivers, so they can live where their predators cannot.

What's worse than the nettles' sting is their diet, Bologna said.

"They are voracious predators," he said. "They eat things like oyster larvae, blue crab larvae and fish larvae."

But while environmentalists have frequently tied increased nitrogen levels to the proliferation of sea nettles, Bologna said the latest research is showing that the switch from chemically treated lumber to plastics in dock and bulkhead construction have been the primary driver of the invasion.

Plastic and vinyl docks are good because they are nontoxic, Bologna said, "but bad because animals can settle on them."

In fact, he said, sea nettle polyps are now overwintering on plastic floating docks left in the water. He suggests those who live on the bay pull their floating docks when they end their boating season.

Tackling Nitrogen, Runoff

But just because high nitrogen levels might not be the be-all and end-all of the sea nettle invasion, policymakers shouldn't abandon efforts to reduce it.

Willie deCamp, Save Barnegat Bay's president, said the eel grass beds that foster the life of finfish and shellfish larvae are getting destroyed because nitrogen-induced plant growth is cutting off sunlight to the native grasses. Another reason for the decline in eelgrass is runoff, fertilizer and, according to deCamp, most importantly, rain contaminated by the use of fossil fuels.

That's where he thinks Christie's plan to clean up the bay didn't go far enough.

"Governor Christie has put more energy into Barnegat Bay than any other governor, but the administration has to listen better," deCamp said. "We have to get the subject of clean air into the program."

On that front, Assemblyman John McKeon, an Essex County Democrat, spoke before the group and criticized Christie for pulling out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a state-by-state cap and trade program designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

McKeon, who maintains a summer home in Brick's barrier island section, also criticized Christie for vetoing a bill that would have allowed Ocean County towns to assess fees on developers to help pay for stormwater basin improvements with the aim of reducing runoff into the bay. The Ocean County freeholder board came out squarely against the measure, saying it would have resulted in extra taxes directed solely on Ocean County residents and businesses.

McKeon did concede, however, that the Republican governor's brokering of a deal to shutter the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant 10 years before its license expired represented a "good compromise."

The Bay's Future

Most of Save Barnegat Bay's experts said there was much work to be done before the bay's problems could be fully understood. But the good news is that the work is, indeed, being done.

Kennish, the Rutgers professor, said researchers from the state university, Monmouth University, Montclair State University and Georgian Court University all have projects in the works that are actively researching the bay estuary. That, combined with action from the Department of Environmental Protection to implement and enforce the regulations in the bills passed earlier this year, is a step in the right direction, he said.

"Everyone is finally coming together," he said.

Related Topics: Barnegat Bay, Chris Christie, Environment, John McKeon, Pollution, Willie deCamp, and save barnegat bay

Jim

9:52 am on Friday, July 15, 2011

The bay needs another inlet. Lets reopen Cranberry inlet and get rid of sleeze side.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

11:43 am on Friday, July 15, 2011

You know, Jim, this was one of the topics someone asked about in the question-and-answer session after the meeting - though they specifically asked about it in the context of Long Beach Island (in my head, I was thinking Cranberry Inlet would be far more relevant). Dr. Bologna, essentially, said that all we need is a good hurricane to shake things up and get extra water flowing into the bay. As someone whose family resides on a barrier island, I had a bit of a heart attack!

There was also a quick mention of a project in Alaska where they ran a pipe under an island and installed pumps to increase water flow into a back bay. But Bologna said that might not work here, since tide fluctuations could lead to either flooding or such a huge drop in the bay's water level at low tide that the waterway could become un-navigable and potentially unlivable for some species.

Reply

bill wolfe

1:13 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

I question on what basis (data) Decamp claims that atmospheric deposition (air pollution) is the largest source of nitrogen to the Bay.

The data I’ve seen does NOT support that statement. Just the opposite: atmospheric deposition is the smallest source, and perhaps the relatively least able to be managed cost effectively because years of effort and billions of dollars have already been invested in NOx air pollution controls, so the low hanging fruit has been picked. ...

..., a December 7, 2009 USGS study estimated that total nitrogen loadings for the Bay are 650,000 kg/year, with only 22% from atmospheric deposition, 66% from surface water, and 12% from groundwater.

Furthermore, directly on point, that USGS study found:

"This new loading estimate was compared to a previously published estimate produced by using a similar methodology but lesss current data through 1997. Findings of the present study include a substantially lower estimate of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen to the estuary compared to the previous estimate. The study results also offer further support of the relation btween land use and nitrogen levels, and indicate that the Toms and Metedeconk river basins account for more than 60% of the nitogen load to the estuary from surface-water discharge."

for complete post and supporting links, see:
http://tinyurl.com/3rgh567

Reply

bill wolfe

1:18 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Forgot to praise this article: well written and hits the issues.

But I'd like to see a little more objective assessment of the Christie plan and discussion of the TMDL issue in particular.

As I've written, the Clean Water Act's TMDL program is the most effective tool in the toolkit for restoring water quality problems. That is what US EPA is using in the Chesapeake Bay. See:

http://www.wolfenotes.com/2011/07/epa-intervenes-but-dep-still-spinning-on-the-dock-of-the-bay-wasting-time/

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

1:45 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Bill -- TMDL is most definitely on my radar. Last night I heard about it for the first time (Mr. Kennish from Rutgers discussed it) and I'm definitely going to be following up and learning more about it for a future article dedicated solely to that topic.

shorecorruption

1:21 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Dredging ! More water flow. And pre treatment plants for storm water runoff. Do all the studies you want, and wast all the money you want looking at the problem.

Reply

bill wolfe

2:10 pm on Friday, July 15, 2011

Daniel - your readers should know that Rutgers and Montclair State are members of NJ Sea Grant Consortium. Significant research work is funded by NOAA.

NOAA grant funding guidelines prohibit scientists from engaging "advocacy at all costs". Violations of that policy can and have resulted in loss of NOAA funding.

NOAA funded scientists that are critical of politiicians and corproations have been know to suffer retaliation, including loss of funding. PEER recentl petitioned NOAA to end this policy adn proactice. That request was denied by NOAA.

No NJ Sea Granted funded institutions have opposed this affront to academic integrity, restriction on free speech, or barrier to scientific and democratic discourse. Shame on them.

See this discussion and links to NOAA documents:

"NOAA Keeps Gag Rule On University Marine Scientists — Rejects Petition to Lift Ban against “Advocacy” by Sea Grant Recipients
http://tinyurl.com/3wo8wty

Readers should consider that in evaluating NOAA funded scientists' claims. -

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Berkeley Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks