patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Public Meeting to Discuss Replacement of Oyster Creek

State to update community on the status of the concept of constructing a new facility locally

 

As the closure of Oyster Creek Generating Station inches closer, the township and state continue to work on the concept of constructing a new facility locally and will be seeking public input on Wednesday, April 24 at the Lacey Middle School.

Officials from the townships of Lacey, Ocean and Barnegat recently met with the state Department of Planning Advocacy to discuss the next phase of locating a new generating facility in Lacey Township by 2019, when the operation of Oyster Creek will cease.

“As far as moving forward, it’s important,” Lacey Mayor David Most said. “This is a long process and I’m looking forward to the state and the different organizations coming together looking for input from all our residents.”

The state is looking to have public meetings in each of the three towns, Township Administrator and Municipal Clerk Veronica Laureigh said. The meeting will update each community on the status of the project and there will be informational round tables.

The public meeting will include two sessions for residents — from 4 to 6 p.m. and 7 to 9 p.m.

“I think that will be very productive,” Most said. “2019 is coming up soon with the closure of Oyster Creek and I think it’s imperative that we plan for that.”

The closure of Oyster Creek, America’s oldest operating nuclear power plant, was announced in December 2010 after reaching an agreement with the state. The plant will shut down in 2019, ten years before its federal operating license expires. 

The state’s Energy Master Plan discusses the importance of replacing the nuclear plant’s capacity upon its closure. It cites Lacey Township as a good place to locate a new plant because of the presence of a “highly skilled workforce,” community support and the existing electrical transmission infrastructure.

“I believe the state understands the significance and the impact it’s going to have on not only Lacey Township, this community, but our surrounding communities as well,” Most said. “It’s something that we’re addressing and we’re moving onward. It’s a long process and as long as we’re in the fight, I can assure you we’re going to fight for the town.”

The retirement of Oyster Creek will present the state with a challenge and its location prevents “significant transmission bottlenecks and overloads,” the state Energy Master Plan says.

When a power plant closes, there is usually an increase in wholesale energy and capacity prices, the plan states. Also, at least $100 million in transmission upgrades will be required in order to transfer energy to the region, Greg Reinert, spokesman for the Board of Public Utilities, previously said.

Oyster Creek is also a major source for jobs, employing nearly 700 workers and providing more than $70 million in wages, property taxes and purchases of goods and services from New Jersey businesses.

Most has been advocating replacing Oyster Creek’s generation with a new facility in Lacey since December 2010.

Birdsall Services Group conducted a feasibility study for Lacey Township for $22,500. The study provides an assessment of existing conditions, development constraints and permitting requirements at 798 South Main St., which is currently owned by JCP&L and located behind Oyster Creek.

A public information session held by Congressman Jon Runyan (R-3) in Lacey in September, pointed that a new facility to replace Oyster Creek would adequately make up for lost taxes and power generation but fall far short of providing the jobs currently offered at the power plant.

A natural gas facility was presented as the “only answer.”

Related Topics: Berkeley Township news and Oyster Creek

foggyworld

1:19 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Seems to me there ought to be a meeting in Berkeley Township, too. We are in the kill zone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachel

7:17 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Fog, do you really think having a town meeting would help? We don't have the most intelligent leaders or politicians. Just like sandy, the nuclear plant is going to be a long drawn out exhausting process.

foggyworld

1:20 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

The very last thing we need is another nuclear facility. This area is heavily populated and ought to be nuke free. We have paid our dues.

Reply

Nj Ghost

2:03 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Can someone tell me what the fear is over nuclear power plants? A new one will be built with all the latest technology that goes into these sort of things.....Where, besides Russia has there been a major failure? Japan? They were told not to build there....It held up to the earthquake it was the tsunami that did it in.... I for one am pro nuke. It's been around for decades....All it does is boil water to generate much needed power.

Reply

foggyworld

6:41 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

No it does more than boil water. The 50,000 spent but irradiated rods will be fodder for all sort of mischief or worse and to put a gas plant right near those rods which will be radiated for 300,000 years seems beyond foolhardy. Move your gas plant away from the already in place Kill Zone. Please.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachel

7:26 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Thanks for your post Fog. I didn't know.

Comment_arrow

Nj Ghost

9:09 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

what kill zone? who got killed? everyone is so afraid...calm down people, nuclear plants are safe

Comment_arrow

Cartman

9:13 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

Can someone explain kill zone ?

foggyworld

8:46 pm on Sunday, April 14, 2013

Yes, people within X number of miles of the plant would die rather quickly should the plant malfunction.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Berkeley Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks