patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Petitioners to NRC: Shut Down All Fukushima-Like Nuclear Plants

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station one of 21 reactors that more than 8,000 people say should be suspended

 

Petitioners urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to immediately suspend all U.S. nuclear plants with the same type of reactor as the plant in Fukushima, Japan during a recent public hearing.

“This appeal is for human sensibility, moral responsibility and due process,” said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project for Beyond Nuclear. “Fukushima tragically demonstrates that the Mark 1 containment liability is a deceptive falsehood, a breach of contract to both the NRC and public health and safety.”

The public hearing was prompted by a petition of more than 8,000, including the local group Grandmothers, Mothers and More for Energy Safety (GRAMMES), calling on the NRC to “freeze our Fukushimas.”

The petition, headed by Beyond Nuclear, an anti-nuclear organization, calls for the immediate suspension of 17 nuclear facilities with General Electric (GE) Boiling Water Reactors Mark 1 units, the same type of reactors at Fukushima that experienced a meltdown following an earthquake and tsunami.

The advocates are also fighting for the 1989 approval of an experimental venting system to be revoked as well as for Mark 1 operators to install emergency backup power for the spent fuel cooling system, Gunter, said.

The NRC-run hearing gave the petitioners the opportunity to comment on requested emergency enforcement actions to suspend operations at Fukushima-style nuclear reactors, like the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Lacey Township.

Oyster Creek - the oldest nuclear plant in the United States - has generated  over 700 tons of high-level radioactive waste, Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear said.

“Granted that some of that has been moved into dry cast storage, but the pool remains full to its capacity," Kamps said. "And this was a re-rack capacity. Much later in terms of quantity of high level radioactive waste than it was originally designed for.”

This represents 125 million curies of radioactive cesium-137 and the NRC has reported that up to 100 percent of the hazardous material could be released from a pool fire, Kamps said.

“I would like to point out that Fukushima Daiichi units one, two, three and four combined in terms of the inventory of high level radioactive waste in their storage pools does not match some of these reactors I mentioned in terms of how much waste is in these pools,” Kamps said. “So the risks are greater here for boil downs and the consequences of a radioactive fire in these pools.”

The NRC's petition review board is considering revoking the approval of the vents currently installed at Oyster Creek, Gunter said. The vents were installed in 1990.

In 1972, several years after Oyster Creek came online, the containment structures of Mark 1 boilers were deemed likely to fail under a severe accident, Gunter has said.

It was later confirmed that there is a 90 percent failure rate under severe conditions, Gunter said. In 1989 the NRC approved the voluntary installation of vents, which would vent open containment to the atmosphere.

The same vents installed at Oyster Creek were installed at Fukushima in 1991. When Japan was hit with a devastating earthquake and tsunami in March, those vents had a 100 percent failure rate on three reactors, Gunter said.

“It will be at least several years, if ever, until the full extent of the Fukushima accident are actually known and understood,” said Dale Bridenbaugh, former GE engineer and current nuclear power whistleblower. “It is unreasonable for all U.S. citizens who could be affected by a major accident at Mark 1 plants to be held at risk for yet another period of years when it is uncertain similar consequences could happen here.”

Gunter noted that radioactive fuel fragments were found scattered around the Fukushima site and were ejected a mile-and-a-half away from the reactor. Extensive radioactive cesium contamination was documented in soil samples at locations as far as 35 miles from the power plant.

“You can only imagine how people who live around Mark 1 reactors feel about their vulnerability at this moment and feel about the NRC’s view in this to deal with this issue in a timely manner,” said Deb Katz of Citizens Awareness Network. “There is now a slow motion catastrophe ongoing in Japan with three reactors like our own that will scar that country and the world forever…Move the fuel out of the fuel pools and shutter these reactors because it is unconscionable that you allow the nuclear industry to put us at such a risk.”

Ninety-five percent of the people in the world know about Fukushima, Michael Mariotte of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service said.

“It took a really extraordinary event for 95 percent of the people in the world to know about it," he said. "If they know about Fukushima, they know about Mark 1 reactors exploding in the air and releasing toxic radiation across the world and they know that’s not a good thing. Something has to be done to make sure that never happens again.”

That 95 percent does not know that the NRC knew 40 years ago that the catastrophe at Fukushima was exactly what would happen if a Mark 1 reactor was challenged, Mariotte said. The agency chose not to shut down the reactors because it could have meant the end of nuclear power. Since then they have relied on Band-Aids and luck, which is proving insufficient, he said.

“We do know, as you have known for 40 years as we have known for 40 years, what will happen when that challenge [to a U.S. Mark 1 reactor] comes,” Mariotte said. “The reactor will fail, more communities will be lost, and more lives destroyed. That will be on your [the NRC’s] hands because you have the power to change that. You have the power to close down these reactors and stop with the band-aids and stop relying on pure dumb luck as a protective measure.”

The public hearing was used as a session to listen to the concerns of the petitioners. No action was taken. A representative from the NRC was not immediately available to comment on the next step.

For a copy of the petition, see the attached PDF. 

  • Do You Think Operations at Oyster Creek Should be Suspended?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        58 (4%)
    • No
        1309 (95%)
    Total votes: 1367
  • This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Paul Gunter, beyond nuclear, fukushima, and nuclear regulatory commission
What do you think? Take our poll! Tell us in the comments.

Chris

4:06 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

I just want to mention that the reason there's so much fuel in their spent fuel pool is due to the government's inability to reclaim what is theirs. No nuclear site actually wants that fuel in their spent fuel pool as it greatly hinders movement during a re-fuel outage which translates to a large amount of money. Instead of trying to shut Oyster Creek down, apply pressure to our government to finish construction of Yucca Mountain and reclaim their fuel.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nancy

2:34 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

I don't understand why the author cites professional antinuclear activists paid to dissimulate, as if they are authorities about what happened at a reactor halfway across the world. Who does Paul Gunter talk to? What does he read? Has he ever studied the science, worked in a plant, performed research? Has Deb Katz? Or Michael Mariotte? Kevin Kamps? What do they know, and why should anyone listen to them, when they are just mercenaries, paid to spin and manipulate? The news here is that this tract passes itself off as journalism. Ms. Piniat, why don't you try digging into the readily available reports about what happened there, and present the facts, and let your readers make up their own minds whether they ought to be frightened? Why do you need to do their thinking for them?

Jack

7:51 am on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

If Patricia Miller had bothered to do the fact-checking required by journalistic integrity she would have come across this video showing 30 feet of water above the fuel at Fukushima with all of the fuel bundles exactly where they're supposed to be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCY0xQRZ1UY&feature=related

NOTHING happend to the fuel in the pools at Fukushima. I would like to see some evidence other than the word of an activist who frightens kids for a living to support Gunter's rant about peices of fuel being ejected miles away. From the looks of that video, the fuel didn't move an inch.

Reply

Sgray

4:25 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Common sense, solve the waste problem use common sense, reprocess the spent fuel and burn it away, use the small amount of waste as useful products. Future reactors should be paired or in threes, with fuel used in one transferred to the next and then the next (PWR to Heavy Water to IFR) and only built for natural convection cooling in case of loss of power or Nuclear warfare EMF attacks. Common sense.

Reply

JMA

9:49 am on Thursday, October 13, 2011

This article is way too one sided and not to mention very inaccurate! There was NO fuel that was blown away in this accident. There was damage to the core but the fuel remained inside of the containment. The Explosioin was due to Hydrogen being released to the top of the reactor instead of the atmosphere. There have been many changes and modifications to this type of reactor design which not all were implemented in the Japan reactors. I think you need to qoute people who are actually working with Fukushima instead of pure anti-Nuclear people who's sole purpose is shutting down Nuclear instead of SAFE production of energy.

Reply

Rod Adams

3:36 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

Marriotte makes an interesting statement by he claiming that "95% of the people in the world" know about Fukushima. That statement might be true about the people in the United States, where advertiser-supported television news programs covered the events with breathless hype for several months.

I am pretty sure that you would have a difficult time finding anyone in China, central Africa, the Asian subcontinent, South America or the Middle East who can even pronounce Fukushima, much less know anything about GE Mark 1 containments. Most of them would not even know that they should be worried about radiation because they have never been taught to be afraid of something that they cannot smell, feel, taste, or hear especially when it occurs at levels that have no chance of making them sick within their expected lifetime.

Marriotte, Gunter, Kamps, Katz and Bridenbaugh are all members of a vocal, but tiny group of people who have been carrying the water of the fossil fuel industry for decades by opposing nuclear energy, the only real competitor it has. They are victims of groupthink who believe that their neighbors in Takoma Park are representative of the whole world.

Just before making this comment, I voted in the unscientific poll associated with the article. 95% say that Oyster Creek should keep on powering New Jersey homes and businesses. They are not impressed by the Beyond Nuclear FUD; they like clean electricity.

Rod Adams, Publisher, Atomic Insights

Reply

Rod Adams

9:31 am on Friday, October 14, 2011

I apologize. I should have done a better job of proofreading my previous comment. Mr. Mariotte's name has one 'r', not two.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Berkeley Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks