In Lacey, the face of the school district has lost its voice.
It lost what once gave it pride, a sense of openness that other districts could envy — even as it has endured, over the past two decades, tragedy as well as the trivial.
Now, under Superintendent Sandra Brower, it chooses to stay silent - with Patch, in particular - even on the simplest of matters. Even on the trivial.
Reporters and editors, such as Patch Local Editor Elaine Piniat, once could merely walk up to the superintendent, ask a question and get an answer, however short.
Now Elaine and others find themselves filling out forms just to do the same thing.
What little is revealed, when a question is asked, might as well not be revealed at all. What little is available must be requested in the form of an Open Public Records Act inquiry.
What little that's provided often comes in the form of a denial, or something very close. If there is any relevant text that is provided, much of it is blacked out and redacted.
This is not just a quick impression, or an impulsive judgment made by disgruntled journalists. The apparent policy — a word that Brower says does not apply to her relationship with the media or the public — has sustained itself for at least two months now.
For Brower, it doesn't appear to be rooted in any personal, principled opposition to what's become an online media staple: Allowing readers to comment on stories, so there is a balance of views with every report.
It's what they're saying about her, and her performance, that seems to gall her.
"Given all of the recent attacks on school personnel including teachers, administrators and board members that continue to be promoted on The Patch, the stories related to student programs and highlights are the ones that we will actively and enthusiastically participate in," Brower wrote in a March email to Patch.
Patch removed comments that were considered personal attacks. Most other comments were left up — even though Brower demanded they be taken down - because they were judged as mere subjective criticism, not a personal attack.
One example was this one:
"Maybe this is part of the $5m increase in the budget. Fight back Lacey!"
For the past two months, Brower has not wavered. While Elaine had long interviews and conversations with former Lacey Superintendent Richard Starodub - in his office, at meetings and on the phone - when he served until last fall, Brower chooses to ignore.
"When The Patch decides to change its policies that currently promote the types of demeaning and vicious attacks on our school community," Brower wrote in the March email, "I would again consider to supporting the good work that you do."
The email came in response to Elaine's request to discuss Lacey's Adequate Yearly Progress status for 2011. Last year, she met with Starodub and Assistant Superintendent Vanessa Clark so they could explain any improvements or shortfalls.
Now Starodub is gone. This year, when she made the request, Elaine was left with an email that, after a small introduction, said this:
"Neither of us are available for this story."
Patch also asked Brower about summer session policies and whether she will be able to respond to questions regarding substitute teachers.
Brower's response?
"Policies are reviewed regularly," she wrote.
Both Patch and John Paff, chairman of the state Libertarian Party's Open Government Advocacy Project, have submitted at least eight requests for information on staffing issues. Nearly all personnel matters fall under the protection of the Sunshine Law, and can be withheld from the public.
But can they release information about a teacher's length of service, as well as their salary, since both matters deal with public money?
In Lacey, it's hard to say. In one request, Elaine asked whether a particular teacher is still working in the district. She also asked if the teacher resigned, and if she was tenured; she inquired about her dates of employment.
After submitting it to James Savage, the district's business administrator, she received this:
"Denied."
The reason?
"Your request does not specify a government record."
Controversy has followed Lacey School District for 30 years — perhaps never more so than in 1997, when a Lacey Township senior gave birth to a baby boy during her prom. The baby was discovered in a trash bag in the ladies room of a catering hall.
The case drew nationwide media attention, nearly all of it unwanted by the district — then headed by Starodub — and the students.
But on graduation day, some school officials helped escort reporters out to the football field — including myself — as some in the crowd showered us with boos and jeers.
The township is unusual in its ways, having a tight-knit community with no clear hangout, no clear place to meet and have coffee, and no traditional downtown business center.
There's the German Butcher on Lacey Road, and the authentic stores that harken back to Lacey's Pinelands' past, when it was truly only known by its sections: Forked River, Bamber Lake and Lanoka Harbor.
But the township also has its suburban sprawl that stretches from one end of Lacey Road to the other. Its community center has become, in a way, the Lacey Board of Education meeting room, where praiseworthy gestures can get beaten down by political posturing.
In 1994, Starodub dealt with it head on, faced with a Lacey Board of Education meeting room that was divided over the fate of the high school's baseball coach.
The coach's supporters called the process demeaning, questioning why the coach was put in this position in the first place. Others were more dead-center. "He's not a good coach. He's hurting kids more than helping them," said one former player who graduated two years before.
In the middle of it all was Starodub, who played mediator and mentor. Before the meeting even started, he talked to reporters (including me) and prepared them for what they were going to see.
The board, he said, wouldn't talk about personnel matters out loud. But they wouldn't stop others from doing the same thing.
"Nothing's decided until it's decided," he said, but saying it with a slight but welcoming smile.
The reporters asked for more. Starodub, in his humble, matter-of-fact way, folded his arms and then made his prediction.
Nothing would be decided that night, he said.
That's all the reporters — and the public — wanted to know. When the meeting ended, it turned out to be true.
gettin by
7:29 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Very well written article. Brower should take heed on how Starodub reacted with the media. When public figures refuse to give out information, it looks like there is something to hide. If Brower was concerned that the media was painting a negative picture of her, by her denials she has just made things even worse than before.
M'Linda Kula
8:58 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
" It looks like there is something to hide"-----NO KIDDING! PARENTS--home school YOUR CHILDREN. THIS ACTION ON YOUR PART WILL GO A LONG WAY IN KEEPING YOUR CHILDREN --- off drugs.
Wise Owl
9:36 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Brower has to go, she is a cancer to the district.
Jim
9:50 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Times are changing. New technologies provide everyone with a voice. Whether an individual is smart or stupid, rational or insane, a supporter or a troll (as the kids say) - he or she can be post to the web via the Patch or other venues. There's no stopping it.
The school is obligated to provide certain requested information under the Open Public Records Act and perhaps some other statutes, but it is not required to do more.
That having been said, The Patch is (relatively) widely read in this town, and it would be good to see a better relationship between it and the school system.
Ideally, Patch editors and School representatives would have lunch together and work out their differences.
Pamela Brown ♥
9:44 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Well said.
Jim
9:53 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
To The Patch: The school might not respond to the simplest requests from you because there is no trust, and they've just decided to "opt out" of a relationship. Lately, you have been doing a better job of controlling the crazy saboteurs who just log on to assassinate people's character. To quote web savvy kids again "Haters Gonna Hate". If The Patch vets hateful comments properly, everyone wins. Keep working on it, and perhaps the school will not feel that it is dangerous or counterproductive to cooperate with you.
To the School: Realize that information and opinions are going to flow regardless of your preferences. The old days are over, and it is much more difficult to control information. If the Patch better controls the "trolls" it can become a great, reasonable, forum-of-choice for citizens of Lacey to learn and comment about their school system. You're not going to like everything that gets published in The Patch, but at least the "trolls" will leave. They'll be driven to more obscure web forums, and that's good.
Openness and cooperation between The Patch and the District would be a good thing for the district and this town. Hopefully everyone involved can come to an agreement.
teatleytea
5:57 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Wake up residents of the Lacey Township School District, because if you don't you and your town are more than likely going to follow in the footsteps of the Toms River Regional School District. Here in Toms River we have the distinction of being the school district that not only had their Superintendent's house raided by the FBI and the IRS but, also having his name and face plastered all over the news as he was deciding when and where he was going to give up to the Federal Government, we also had a Assistant Band Director who was caught stealing instruments and selling then for his own profit then we have a janitor who is under investigation for a child pornography sting, a head of athletics who not only sold the school district inferior sports equipment but, was also arrested for insurance fraud who then turned into one of the main witnesses in the Ritacco Corruption Case oh, and let us not forget about a certain lunch lady who is making over 75,000.00 a year to run a cafe that is losing to the schools Business Administrator own admission 250,000.00 a year. Ah yes, we also have BOE members who have been on the board for decades who have also made sure that they secured jobs for not only their family but, their friends. We also have an architect who also had his house raided by the FBI and way too many things to list. Now, our new Super wants us to believe that things are going to change? Well,here we are 3 years later and things are still the same.
JB
9:59 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Wow, what happened to freedom of speech? Sorry Lacey Patch that you have to go through this. It isn't the Patch that is making the comments ( I've seen comment removed by The Patch). People have a right to speak (this is America), if you don't like it do something about. Try to reach out to them. Let them see your side of it. I have a question. Can any one not related to some that works in the district get a job with in the district? A friend of my went for a job interview there. This person hasn't heard anything about it. Yet heard that the job was given to someone who knew someone. There are poeple that are working in the district that shouldn't be working with children, they are way to unprofessional. Yet this happens everyday.
WeAnne
7:52 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I understand what you are saying JB but I can say from experience that this problem is all over the state.I think in many other professions as well. It is unfortunetly always about who you know not how well you are qualified for a job.
isthatallugot
10:07 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Just another example of corruption in this town!!!!
stretch113
10:09 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Really now! A school official not wanting to comment . . . Don't blame anyone there. I've seen how words get 'twisted' after any comments. So I'm in agreement as to keeping tight lips . . . because we all know the cliche "Loose lips sink ships" and the Lacey School system is sinking . . . . Commodore Brower needs to abandon ship and let the crew carry-on thier duties . . . . . .Now that my kids are out of there, they'll get a GOOD education, proper guidance and on to a fulfilling career & life. I knew a lot of teachers and they all cared for their students and wanted to teach . . .NOW it's 'just a job'. . . . . there goes the quality of education in this town . . . . .
Jim
10:15 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Freedom of speech is guaranteed, but individual entities (radio stations, papers, TV stations, The Patch), are not required to publish/broadcast everyone who wants to be heard.
They can publish what they want to - and delete what they want to.
The first amendment exists to protect speech from government suppression; not to compel publishers to carry any given individual's message.
Wise Owl
10:32 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Jim, get out of your Ivory Tower and go talk to the teachers and administrators. Brower is destroying the close knit community atmophere that made Lacey so special. She should return to Wall where she can be as adversarial and invisible as she wants to be. She is a bad fit for Lacey.
Jim
10:54 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Hi Wise Owl,
I know this town, and the school, as well as most people do.
The jury is still out on the new super. She hasn't even been here all that long. From what I understand she is implementing changes. Some of them seem pretty good to me. What I do know from experience is that there are always going to be people who don't like change. There are always lots of reasons for that. They may be right or wrong - time will tell.
A question for you: What are the new policies/procedures/personnel changes that are making things worse?
Wise Owl
11:03 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Ask the patch.
johndoe
11:36 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
This piece is a disgrace to the little bit of credibility that the Patch holds. Obviously Superintendent Brower is not the same personality that Starodub was and has no obligation to interact with the media in the same way. If the Patch is trying to form a relationship with the school district and they have not been responding in your favor then writing your opinion in public like this and calling out the superintendent for her response just burned any bridges you were trying to build. How do you expect the school district to comply with any request you make after this? This really is nothing more than a one sided opinion that is only going to ignite the commenters on your articles even more than they have been. While I am not saying I agree with the way the school district is handling public inquiries, they have technically done nothing wrong.
I agree with freedom of speech and everyone is entitled to an opinion, however, as a 'professional' news organization, you should take into consideration the 'power' that you have in influencing public opinion. What makes a school district complete is not just the administration and the teachers, it is the community as a whole -- this includes media outlets such as the Patch. If the 'tight-knit community' that you speak of cannot stand behind those who are in charge of our schools, it does nothing more than add to the breakdown of our community and our schools. This is not the example we need to be setting for our children.
Wise Owl
11:59 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Isn't interesting that all this dessension started in the last six months. Its obvious that the new person in charge does not know how to lead, communicate with her staff and the press, or fix what she has broken. The BOE is to blame for bringing in an unknown and untested person into this position. Now Lacey will have to be stuck with her for the duration of her contract or buy her out at Taxpayers expense. A very sad situation that the BOE created. After all his years on the job, they basically told the former super that his opinion in the picking of his successor was not wanted. Who will right this rudderless ship???
Norman V. James
1:14 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
We have ourselves to blame.We vote the same people into office time after time.
When we do get a board member who does not agree with the sycophants : They are insulted and made fun of with smirks and laughs .
Keep voting these same people in . You deserve it.
Sick and Tired
12:06 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
What happened to everyone saying how terrible and overpaid Starodub was? When will you people realize that there will always be someone who is complaining?
Jim
12:19 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Hi Wise Owl,
"Its obvious that the new person in charge does not know how to lead, communicate with her staff and the press, or fix what she has broken."
It's not obvious. Way too vague. Yes, The Patch is not happy with the district, and vice- versa. Yes, The Patch loved Starodub. Hey, I had some neighbors who were thrilled to see him go. So what.
Is that it? Maybe people will agree with you if you tell us. What big decisions are making things worse?
We've already heard you say that people are unhappy, people are talking, she's breaking things, and so forth.
Can you list some bad decisions?
...and regarding availability, didn't she invite everyone to a bunch of coffee meetings?
Have you called her office to make an appointment to air your specific grievances? If you did you get an appointment? How were you received?
Give us something real to work with here. Maybe you have something, I sincerely want to know.
Wise Owl
12:36 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Her #1 Priority is promoting herself through her coffee meetings and on the website.
I just hope her #2 Priority is the kids.
TheGreatHoax
12:48 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Still waiting for the specifics that Jim asked you for.
Those coffee meetings are an open forum to communicate with her. What's wrong with that?
Her number one priority is MOST DEFINITELY THE KIDS. That's why some are not happy.
Amy
4:14 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
coffee meetings are ridiculous...she should pick up the phone and return the Parents calls and emails....still waiting for a response 3 WEEKS after I sent an email to her. And over a matter of safety concerning my child. Starodub would never have done that.
TheGreatHoax
6:01 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
@ Amy - yeah Mr. S was great at giving lip service . . . . . once you finally got in to see him.
Amy
8:35 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Well I only had to deal with him once but his response was day after my letter to him was received so I can't complain. The issue was addressed and rectified. Can't say the same about the current situation. Oh well, the year is almost over
Beach Girl
1:39 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@Amy - a paper letter may work better than an email. Usually the super's secretary filters the emails. Good luck!
TheGreatHoax
12:44 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The incestuous relationship between the BOE and the Superintendent is over. Is that what has people upset? Remember when their apple cart was upset after Tom P. was elected to the BOE. They belittled him and then came up with bogus ethics charges to run him of the board. Improvements were needed in the Lacey School District just as Mr. P. said. The BOE and Starodub refused to acknowledge there were problems. Until the Patch there was no forum for people to resolve issues for fear of retaliation (as in the way Mr. P was treated). Parents/students just had to turn a blind eye to problems. I'm glad they hired an outsider. Dr. B. is making changes and some are getting P.O.ed at that. Some will have to actually do their job now that the smooth Mr. S is gone. There have been postings on the patch that seem to be "leaks" from the inside as far as proposed changes so obviously Dr. B. has to be careful of who knows what if plans for certain changes aren't ready to go public. Tough to work with people you can't trus. Seems she's surrounded by nasty cads who just want to keep the status quo. From what I've heard she's on the side of students, families and educators dedicated to their jobs. Good riddance to the old Super.
Jim
12:53 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Alright Wise Owl,
I thought you might have had some knowledge about recent changes at the school, and some opinions about why they're not constructive.
All done.
Regis Busch
7:46 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Bravo Jim!
TheGreatHoax
1:07 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Guaranteed that the ones posting negative comments are disgruntled district employees that aren't happy that they may be held accountable and may actually have to put in a full days work for a "change". There's many excellent teachers in this district, it's a shame the negative ones are the only vocal ones.
Disgruntledmuch
4:51 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
well well Patch. So you say you are not disgruntled. Maybe just a little bit? So she decides not to play your game of 'scandal, lies and attacks' and this is what you do. Interesting tact. Seems she rose above to me and you didnt like it one bit. 'Lacey Word' on the town without a center as you say is you are alienating yourself and your readers. You promote our kids dont have heart. Our community has more heart than you know. Dispecable to bring up the death of a baby for your personal gain. Hope all businesses are taking note. The Patch is devisive and destructive. Boycott all media like to Patch who promote attacks on our community. We are role models for our kids and we dont want your type of media. Let's all practice, "I don't read the Patch, why would you?"
gettin by
5:02 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
This was not an article so much as an editorial. There will always be complaints about anyone in the public eye but for Brower to not make any comments is very suspicious. I think the people who pay her salary (US!) have a right to know certain things and the Patch is one way many of these things can be conveyed. For her to be mute is an error.
Disgruntledmuch
5:35 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Maybe you should get another reporter or maybe Patch needs another editor I am certain Ms. Brower has alot to say. Pick up the phone and call her. Oh she wont answer you, Patch, because you have villified her and her staff. Bet she returns any other call she gets. 609-971-2002 Back to Toms River Elaine. Thanks but we are all good.. APP looks better by the day.
Pamela Brown ♥
7:03 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Accountability and transparency in public schools are the real story.
The scores show TEN YEARS of failing scores. http://www.state.nj.us/education/title1/accountability/ayp/1112/profiles/sini/29_profiles.pdf
Lacey has terrible scores on NJ ASK.
http://www.state.nj.us/education/title1/accountability/ayp/1112/profiles/ayp/29_profiles.pdf
Could it be the system of education we are using is an outdated model for today's learners??
The parents have expressed concerns and dissatisfaction. If they complain at a board meeting their child pays for it, so the anonymity of Patch appeals to them. The schools then blame the students or the families. Or call DYFUS on them. The staff who are paid to work at the schools should be resilient enough to handle their hurt feelings. State worker's salary/info is actually public information: http://php.app.com/edstaff/search.php
These are good kids, so where is the breakdown? Now, parents have a choice, They can choose an interdisctict schools for free.
http://www.state.nj.us/education/choice/districts/
Parents can also choose to start a public charter school, run by parents.
It is actually a good idea for the parents to do this before the religions and for-profits step in and take over public education. Involved parents helps kids achieve academically. June 18 - next School Board Meeting.
Feel free to email CreativeStudiesCS@gmail.com if you would like more information or to be a part of the solution.
Backtwo
9:37 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
You comment that the NJ ASK is relevant, why besides State Report Card and State funding? What is the child getting from it. Actually, the NJ ASK is on its way out and another similar test will replace it for 2014.
I think Goldie Hawn stated it best in the movie "Overboard", "And you can sit here and smugly lecture me on the importance of tests? Tests which exist to pigeonhole childrens potential, a thing which cannot *possibly* be measured. That statement is true!
Look at recent college applications and see what they are looking for; colleges are looking for what the studnets do outside of school, and not just basing their acceptance solely on test scores.
Pamela Brown ♥
9:42 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
A reporter asked a question regarding the district's test results.
No smug lecture, just a Superintendent unwilling to talk to a reporter about the district results on state mandated tests because they don't like the public's comments on Patch. NJ ASK is the current method used to determine achievement aligned with the curriculum. I agree tests are a snapshot of achievement, and potential is not measured by standardized tests. NJ ASK does not measuring "potential". It measures students' competency in regards to the standardized curriculum. Soon it (or something similar to it with a new name) will be part of teacher evaluations. Goldie Hawn is a lovely actress - great quote. TY.
Regis Busch
8:41 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Two months is not a very long time to cultivate a relationship. A relationship you have now soured completely by launching a personal attack, after that relationship was strained due to the perception of personal attacks. At the very least, you have proved her point and only confirmed her position.
Your main criticism seems to be that Dr. Brower does not do things the same way as Richard Starodub. Well, Sandra Brower is not Richard Starodub, nor should she wish to be. She has come into a role and must find her own path. Two months is not an adequate enough time frame to know exactly how she will perform in that role. I prefer to form my judgement of her performance based on the decisions she makes and the policies she implements for the district, not whether she is touchy-feely enough with the Patch. Time will tell when those decisions and policies come to light. It is the Patch's job to inform me of those decisions and policies in an unbiased factual manner.
I'm most disheartened by this article. Journalism is meant to be a presentation of facts from which I can form my own opinion not a reporter's opinion surrounded by the facts that support it. This article fails to inform me of anything but how upset you are that you aren't being given the attention you wish. I see this article as little more than trolling itself. If this is the level of journalism that I can expect from the Patch, then I will chose to get my news elsewhere.
diane
8:50 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The absoute worst thing to do is to not share information. It gives the impression, rightly or wrongly, that there is something to hide. Dr. Brower will have to grow thicker skin if she is going to survive professinally in this town. With the salary and benefits she receives, she has to be not only a leader, but a communicator and get over the fact that she will have people who do not like her no matter what. It is just not the type of high profile job, ivory towers will not win the day. Consistant fairness, hard work and sharing information will do more towards healing the rift.
Mimi Neuhaus
9:00 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
BRAVO PAMELA BROWN AN INTELLIGENT COMMENT AT LAST!
Pamela Brown ♥
11:06 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Well thanks Mimi, more to follow...
Spoiledpatch
9:43 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
I thought she was supposed to lead the school district not be a PR tool for the Patch. Guess when you write an editorial no need to worry about facts or biases. Interesting. Give us a little more credit Elaine.
Pamela Brown ♥
8:49 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@SP - NJ ASK Scores are relevant.
Pamela Brown ♥
11:04 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Martenak said the reorganization would make the district more “efficient.” Enrollment is down, we add more administration. The high school principal job listing is posted. We'll have a NEW position" human resources coordinator". The new special services supervisor will receive ~ 20k more than their Little Silver salary. Sweet. The district is focusing on “professional collegiality” and accountability, but Brower won’t answer ?'s on NJASK scores, the BENCHMARK of public school accountability.
Pamela Brown ♥
11:04 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Her GOALS:
1. Widening administrative resources to create assignments designed to support school improvement efforts. TRANSLATION: Hire more administrators. Patch quotes Brower “we developed and supported school leadership particularly for the role of school principal," The adults need more support?
2. Addressing the degree of separation that existed between district level supervisors and the principal particularly regarding new initiatives and implementations. (?)
3. Updating job descriptions for the following positions: principal, assistant principal, district supervisor of instruction, supervisor of elementary instruction, department chair, athletic director and human resources coordinator. Patch quotes Martenak: The major changes involved in revising those job descriptions is that they are specific to grade levels oppose to curriculum areas. Does rewriting 7 job descriptions warrant a new administrator? Better Patch quote: Amending those job descriptions according to grade levels will provide for “continuous continuity,” Brower said. Well, I do like my continuity continuous-most days.
Backtwo
9:04 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
From what I have read there has only been 1 new postion added, K-12 Humanitiies Supervisor. Using the supervisors that we have and broadening their responsibilities seems wise. Also by doing this it will bring more continuity from grade to grade. Isn't that what Dr. Brower has been trying to set the groundwork for?
Pamela Brown ♥
10:30 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Really? Enrollment is down by almost 300 students since 2006, and B2 thinks it's WISE to add more administrators?
2006-07 High School had 1574 students, in 2009/10 High School had 1481 (-93)
2006-07 Middle School had 815 students, in 2009/10 Middle School had 756 (-59)
2006-07 Mill Pond School had 766 students, in 2009/10 Mill Pond had 751 (-15)
2006-07 Cedar Creek had 626 students, in 2009/10 Cedar Creek had 600 (-26)
2006-07 Lanoka Harbor had 664 students, in 2009/10 Lanoka H. had 594 (-70)
2006-07 Forked River had 559 students, in 2009/10 F. River had 528 (-31)
So folks the new math is: 300 less students = we need more administration...
http://lacey.patch.com/articles/school-district-seeks-new-high-school-principal-after-administrative-reorganization
PS Isn't "Human Resources Coordinator" also a new position?
Wise Owl
7:34 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Great insight Pamela, but what the BOE is clueless and the honeymoon is still on. The incumbents must be voted out in November. Maybe then Lacey Taxpayers will be given an educational alternative for their children. I hope someone is keeping a tally on how much her changes are costing Lacey Taxpayer (and she is not one. She can do her 8 and skate. Our super should be in Lacey 24/7/365. Can you imagine if our Chief of Police lived in Monmouth County.). By the way, one of the first things she did was renovate her office at Taxpayers expense. And how about teachers in the bathrooms at 100k+; and know another administrator that will cost us close to 200K when you add in the 40%+ benefit package. Yea, The BOE knows what they are doing. We need business leaders on the BOE to straighten things out.
In summary
7:47 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Patch Editor Davis and Elaine Piniat- when you make your apology to Mrs. Brower please do publicly. We will all have a little more respect for you when you do. This article is outrageous and it is no wonder Brower wants to focus on Lacey schools instead of Lacey Patch.
To Jim, you are obviously a person of intelligence and character. Look forward to hearing more.
Pamela, really? talk about self-interest. Your charter application was denied because you filled it with misinformation. You have lost all credibility. You may be the exception - post without your real name.
To Wise owl, you are anything but. You really need to get a new part time hobby, It is obvious she has made some decision that you don't like and you write like a spoiled child who hasn't gotten her way. We get it so you can move on. You don't like Brower. Time for you to find a new job or retire. I have been in her office and you are wrong about that too. Get your facts straight.
Pamela Brown ♥
8:46 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@ in summary - or maybe YOU could post with your real name~
I took the time to propose a parent's plan for a charter.
Public education in NJ is changing, and when corporations like Pearson or the "religious non profits" come rolling into town as charters, they will eat you for breakfast, with the very same money you are paying them...which is the taxpayers...who are the parents. Who deserve a voice, even if it's the Patch . Who can't get a straight answer about your NJ ASK Scores...My credibility rocks, but you sound mean, do you teach in town or are you admin??
Wise Owl
7:51 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
In Summary, are you Brower or one of her hentchmen(women)?
concernedparentof4
7:55 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
While my comment has nothing to do with Dr. B., I am appalled by the way the upper administration at Lacey High School talks to concerned parents. I have 4 children in different schools in town, and can say with sheer honesty I have never been treated in such a demeaning manner as I have when dealing with the "go to" people at the high school. I find it very unprofessional to dismiss a parent with legitimate concerns. Two examples come to mind right off the top of my head...the principal speaking to me as if I were one of his students, to a counselor turning their back on me & closing their office door when clearly the conversation was not finished as far as I was concerned. So what is a parent to do? Nothing can be done due to the tenure & those who have it know it. If I don't do my job or treat a customer with the same disrespect I would be fired. Sure, you could call the Super and complain, but all that will achieve is a target on your child. I am very disappointed with the administration at the high school, and I have 3 more children to go through there. My comment is simply my experience. I hope it is not the norm. If it is, we have much larger problems than Dr. B. not speaking to the Patch.
Pamela Brown ♥
8:10 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@ concerned - Didn't Brower just put the administrator from the High School in a district wide supervisory position? Document your concerns through letters/emails, and copy the administrators. Keep it simple and to the point. Tenure affords due process, not lifetime job guarantee. Parents are the childrens' teachers too, their first teacher, and the biggest influence on children's academic success. Parents should be partners in education. Also, watch for pending legislation Christie is about to pass.
TheGreatHoax
10:32 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Dr. Brower listens to parents/students. Thus the campaign to discredit and demean her. If you have issues contact her office.
Shame on Patch. This editorial makes the writer appear to be a very "small" immature and petty man . There are larger issues at stake than a relationship with "Patch". Will I be blocked?
In summary
8:00 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
No WO. I am not. Observer and involved.
Wise Owl
8:09 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Memmber of the BOE defending yor actions? Who are you involved with?
concernedparentof4
12:34 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@Pamela..Thank you for your comment. I appreciate the respectful reply. Yes, I agree, Parents are their child's first teacher. I believe very strongly in schools and homes working together to provide academic success for every child. I am involved with all 4 of my kids schools. As I stated, I have only had this problem with the high school. When someone of "authority" in the school speaks to a parent in the same tone you would speak to a student who got caught doing something wrong, or another who turns their back on you & closes the door, basically dismissing me, it makes it very difficult to be a partner in education at the high school. When I read of the new position for the principal, I nearly choked on my coffee. I will address my concerns with Dr. Brower, hopefully without a trickle down effect to my children, all because a pot has been stirred by their mother. Since Dr. Brower has only been here a short while, I will remain hopeful the replacement of the principal will be chosen wisely. Again, I thank you for your respectful reply.
Pamela Brown ♥
3:36 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
@parent of 4: My pleasure. If it was a business, the approach you describe would not be tolerated. I am sorry you had to experience that type of treatment, but do not give up, you - as a parent - are their best advocate~ With letters or email, your concern is documented, while phone calls / chats are not. Keep posting so others can see they are not alone. Go to board meetings and speak loudly. Seek out supports from people outside of the school- get your pediatrician's advice, ask questions, and do whatever is in your child's best interest. You only get one chance to educate them, do what you have to do to make it work for your family. There is now an free online school approved by the DOE, founded by Tim Nogueira, the Superintendent of Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission. There is also the Interdistrict public schools of choice program, also free. Or you can run for school board (get your notice in by June 5th) and try to change the culture from within. You only get one chance to educate kids, do what you have to do to make it work for your family. Best of luck to you in whatever you choose.
Jerry Springer
8:06 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
This article along with most of the other bashing articles are like a Jerry Springer show. No class.
Morey P
11:51 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Cumming from U that means a lot :-(
JOHNNY Done it
11:07 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Why dont we hire more out of town adminstrators With Doctor degrees & pay them more than previous So our taxes go up and the problem remains the same & the only difference is we are paying more for it....(& I dont work for the school system)
JOHNNY Done it
11:14 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
I also was not impressed with DR brower 's speech at the kindergarten orientation I think Mr rodgers did a better job on his show...
NoCanDo
10:38 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012
Maybe she should let PeeWee Herman speak at the HS Gradualtion :-)
Joe Stewart
3:06 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
People need to start going to meetings and put her on the spot. This is not happening!
William J Moss
5:16 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
People need to start going to meetings and put the school board of education on the spot ,This is what is not happening! Dr Brower's has only been there 7 months they have been there for years . She is trying to do. what they have a deaf ear to.
Just a Peasant
5:23 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
The 'King' , or in this scenario, the 'Super' has no clothes. She has beek hoodwinked by her assistant, who has conviced her how Great the assistant is and how dumb everyone else is. Hopefully she will look into a mirror and she the game that is being played on her.
Just a Peasant
5:37 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Brainstorming is an excellent way of learning who knows what, who has something to offer, and who the dead wood is. Did they tach you that in your Doctoral program? Didn't think so.
Just a Peasant
7:15 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Anyone know how to fill in a cesspool?
River City Rover
9:39 pm on Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Guess we will have a new Super after the ongoing scandal with SB. So sad the disgrace she brought on Lacey. Hope she seves time an loses her pension.
Tom Davis
3:12 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
Any thoughts on this article? http://lacey.patch.com/articles/lacey-schools-superintendent-placed-on-administrative-leave
proud
5:35 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
Well, you know what they say,"loose lips sink ships".
Rachel
6:03 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
I've never heard that expression. What does that even mean @Proud?
proud
6:19 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
Loose lips sink ships comes from World War I and/or WWII, when sailors on leave from their ships might talk about what ship they sailed on or where it had come from, or where it was going. If they talked too much (had 'loose lips') they might accidentally provide the enemy with anecdotal information that might later cause their ship to be tracked, and bombed and sunk, hence 'Loose lips sink ships.' Later, it came to mean any excessive talk might sabotage a project.
proud
6:00 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
1st Protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press, as well as the right to assemble and petition the government
Rachel
7:07 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
@@@@@@@@@ Thanks Proud.
proud
9:30 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2013
Welcome