Berkeley School Officials To Vicari: Don't Go!
Search for a new superintendent has not yet begun, board president says
It's been almost two weeks since Berkeley Township Schools Superintendent Joseph H. Vicari told school board members to start looking for his replacement.
But some Berkeley Board of Education members are hoping to persuade Vicari to stay on, perhaps for even another year.
"We are still trying to convince Mr. Vicari to stick around a little longer," Board President Steven Pellecchia said. "I'd like him to stay until November."
Board Vice-President James Fulcomer wants Vicari to stay on even longer than that.
"My view is to persuade him to continue his philanthropy," Fulcomer said. "He's donating $200,000 a year to the children and parents of Berkeley Township. It is in the interest of the board to persuade our superintendent to stay the full length he can stay, which is a maximum of two years."
Vicari announced earlier this year he would step down before the April school board elections. But the school elections have now been moved to November.
Vicari said he had received stellar evaluations from all of the board members in February, with the except of Dawn Parks. He said he could not continue without the full support of all board members.
"I will not entertain any kind of extension of my contract," Vicari said at the Feb. 9 Board of Education meeting. "The evaluation by Mrs. Parks was not what I expected."
Vicari had served as Berkeley schools superintendent for six years when he returned to the district on April 1, 2011 after a two-year absence.
A previous board in 2008 refused to renew his contract. Vicari has always contended the vote was an illegal one, engineered by the Democratic majority on the board.
Before he returned in 2011,Vicari had offered to work for free. But state law requires that a certified school administrator be paid a minimum salary of $18,500. Vicari returned with no health benefits or travel expenses.
He told the board at the Feb. 9 meeting to consider his reduced salary as a "one-time revenue" for the district.
Parks said she "has a plan that would save Berkeley Township taxpayers money."
"Take on Dr. Parlapanides (Central Regional Schools Superintendent Triantafillos "Tom" Parlapanides) for the whole K-!2," Parks said. "We don't change districts."
Parks said Parlapanides would be paid a dollar for assuming the superintendent's responsibilities for the Berkeley district, while continuing as Central Regional superintendent.
Meanwhile, Pellecchia said a search for a new superintendent has not begun.
Pellechia said he hopes to discuss the matter with the personnel committee sometime this week.
"We haven't even discussed it yet," he said. "We will discuss it if we are going to go in that direction."
The board could advertise and interview candidates, or interview potential replacements for Vicari by using a list of candidates provided by the state Department of Education, Pellecchia said.
"It depends," he said. "Maybe I can convince him to stay until we've chosen his replacement."
Mary M
3:56 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
His time to leave has come. It's time for a change. A superintendent for $1 sound like a good change both financially and academically.
BayvilleDad
4:06 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
It's time to end the politics! Mr. P would be a good choice.
Oscar Wilde
4:29 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
combine these 2 districts.....what are you waiting for !!!!!
Eagleguy
7:07 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Go Vicari Go!
Keeping whats mine
7:27 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
How many pensions and pic ops can one guy deal with? I'm sure he needs a rest by now.
Oscar Wilde
12:09 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Nope just a Libertarian who is sick of the entire fraudulent system
Hearme
4:41 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
I would think you either combine the districts or not. I'm not sure it would be legal to have Dr. P be superintendent of two different districts . That would mean he could make decisions at the one district that could effect the other. I would think that's a conflict of interest.
I also don't think it fair to ask someone to take on that amount of additional workload without paying a fair increase. Not many people would do two jobs for the same pay as they were getting for one. If we become a single district that would be different because it becomes one district and not everything is doubled. It does add work but not as much. I would still think it fair to increase the salary but not necessarily doubled and we still save on benefits. We pay so much less than most districts around the state and country.If you want to keep good people you have to have a reason for them to stay.Teachers, administrative etc.
As for Vacari, I don't feel he should ever have been here as superintendent.He should be gone and the sooner the better.
Commentor
4:43 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Everyone within the school district workforce knows Vicari has been a part time superintendent since being a freeholder. Ever see his picture in the paper during the DAY acting as a freeholder? To bad he had to retire. His final base salary was $162,080 for which he now receives an annual pension of $97,837. In 2006, he also cashed out his pension as an elected official for which he receives $12,157. In addition to his pensions, he also receives an annual (double dip?) stipend of $30,000 as a freeholder. And he's still running around the county as a freeholder. Does the school board pay his mileage? At the $18,000 (?) we are paying him now, we taxpayers are still being ripped off!
Keeping whats mine
6:55 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
FREELOADER!
knarfie
11:57 am on Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Enough o
Enough of Vicari and his gang. Go somewhere else and freeload with your family and friends. Remember, politicians like this guy never do anything for nothing, even if it seems like it.